Community > Forum > National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) > I need a scientific answer...

I need a scientific answer...

Posted by: victorespinoza - Sat Dec 31, 2016 3:39 am
Post new topic Reply to topic
 [ 3 posts ] 
I need a scientific answer... 
Author Message
Launch Director
Launch Director
avatar
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2011 7:59 pm
Posts: 12
Location: Valencia - Venezuela
Post I need a scientific answer...   Posted on: Sat Dec 31, 2016 3:39 am
Valencia, December 11, 2016


To: The President of the United States and the President of NASA
From: Higher Technical University in Computer Science
Subject: Idea and Invention to reach all the planets of the Solar System

Help me with the calculations of a new discovery.

I discovered a new propellant spatial the size of a revolver bullet, that is, of 1 diameter of thickness. And I want to know if 2 or 3 or 4 of these bullets would propel the Space Shuttle attached to NASA's Red External Tank.

I posted on my website, that if we change the gunpowder by the fuel of the Shuttle's External Tank, each bullet propulsor, will produce a force of 5 Newton using hydrogen and oxygen.

What I want to know is: if a nozzle the size of a revolver bullet produces 5 Newtons of force. And if so, how long would the trip to the planet Mars last knowing the following data:

Distance: 80,000,000 km
Weight: 2 Tons
Mass : ?
Strength: I think 5 newton per mini nozzle

Image

I understand that you have a "Space Shuttle external tank" that weighs 762,136 kg and has 350,000 kg of hydrogen and 350,000 kg of liquid oxygen.

I invented a "Micro Rocket Nozzle" to burn 0.001 kg per second, that is, to burn 18 minutes per liter.

If we perform mathematical calculations, we obtain that its Space Shuttle external tank will last 7 years using two of my "micro rocket nozzle", creating a total force of 10 Newton.

I am not a physicist, but I read on the internet that the VASIMR plasma propellant invented by Franklin Chang-Diaz would reach the planet Mars in 40 days using 10 Newton's force. Same as my two "micro rocket nozzles" I mentioned, because they also produce 10 Newton's force.

My proposal is to use your "Space Shuttle" attached to your "Space Shuttle external tank" and put two "micro nozzle rocket" that I invented, to produce 10 Newton of force and reach the planet Mars in 40 days. 7 years of fuel will be left to reach other, more distant planets.

And take the "Space Shuttle" to several planets, without inventing another spacecraft. Just make modifications to the "Space Shuttle external tank" to put two "Micro Rocket Nozzle".

The changes are small and the idea is great.

I sell my invention of the "Micro Rocket Nozzle", in this case the size of 1 centimeter in diameter and 5 centimeter in length. Scientific changes can be made for greater force, but will remain a "Rocket Micro-nozzle".

The price is ($ 100,000,000) One undred Million Dollars.

My email is: victor.elias.espinoza.guedez@outlook.com

Good luck getting to the planets of the Solar System.

Very affectionately,
Victor Elias Espinoza Guedez


Last edited by victorespinoza on Mon Jan 09, 2017 3:32 am, edited 2 times in total.



Back to top
Profile
Space Walker
Space Walker
avatar
Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2006 12:18 am
Posts: 224
Post Re: I need a scientific answer...   Posted on: Sun Jan 01, 2017 5:16 pm
A few problems with your proposal. The main one is getting that huge mass of 762,000 kg to orbit. The SLS could do this in 8 launches which are very expensive though, likely over a billion dollars per launch. The Falcon Heavy could do it in about 15 launches and is cheaper per launch. It would still be a billion dollar total launch cost though.

Another ky problem is the specific impulse, Isp, of your engine. This is a measure of the efficiency of a rocket engine. Higher Isp means you can get higher speed with a lower required amount of propellant. To get to Mars at short travel time you need high travel speed, which VASIMR claims to be able to deliver.

How much do you estimate could be the Isp of your engine?

Bob Clark

_________________
Nanotechnology now can produce the space elevator and private orbital launchers. It now also makes possible the long desired 'flying cars'. This crowdfunding campaign is to prove it:

Nanotech: from air to space.
https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/nano ... 13319568#/


Back to top
Profile WWW
Launch Director
Launch Director
avatar
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2011 7:59 pm
Posts: 12
Location: Valencia - Venezuela
Post Re: I need a scientific answer...   Posted on: Sun Jan 01, 2017 6:24 pm
RGClark wrote:
A few problems with your proposal. The main one is getting that huge mass of 762,000 kg to orbit. The SLS could do this in 8 launches which are very expensive though, likely over a billion dollars per launch. The Falcon Heavy could do it in about 15 launches and is cheaper per launch. It would still be a billion dollar total launch cost though.

Another ky problem is the specific impulse, Isp, of your engine. This is a measure of the efficiency of a rocket engine. Higher Isp means you can get higher speed with a lower required amount of propellant. To get to Mars at short travel time you need high travel speed, which VASIMR claims to be able to deliver.

How much do you estimate could be the Isp of your engine?

Bob Clark


I want to change the gunpowder of a machine-gun bullet, for the 0.001 liter of fuel being used by the NASA Shuttle.

So my rocket nozzle will be 1 centimeter in diameter and 4 centimeter long, like the bullet in a machine gun.

The ISP that I calculate is the same that create 2 machine guns firing, that is to say, 5 Newtons each machine gun and a total of 10 Newtons. You can add 2 more machine guns to create a 20 Newton ISP, because there would be 4 rocket nozzles the size of a machine gun. This would spend 0.004 liters of fuel per second. And it would last 3 years the external tank attached to the space shuttle.

The VASIMR propellant produces 5 Newton of force and they were going to use 2 VASIMR to push the ISS, that is to say, 10 Newton.

In conclusion:

My space propellant creates an impulse just like when we fire 4 machine guns or 2 machine guns. Each machine gun, I think creates a 5 Newton impulse. Same as VASIMR.

NOTE: They are not machine guns, but a rocket micro-nozzle the size of a bullet.

MOTE 2: Results presented in January 2011 confirmed that the design point for optimal efficiency on the VX-200 is 50 km/s exhaust velocity, or an Isp of 5000s. I think my ISP of my each miniature rocket nozzle 1 centimeter in diameter is 5000s too.

NOTE 3: The international space station weighs 450 tons and the shuttle weighs 2 tons. NASA was to use the VASIMR at the international space station using 2 5 Newton motors each according to the photo. My mini rocket nozzle also produces 5 Newtons each. However, 450 tons is greater than 2 tons, therefore produces less mass. If this is so, my miniature rocket nozzle would work by pushing the 2-tonne Shuttle. http://sen.com/blogs/irene-klotz/nasa-nixes-ad-astra-rocket-test-on-the-space-station

Image

Why would NASA move 450 tons of weight into space using 10 Newtons of force, or 1 kilogram of force?

I think my proposal of bullets full of fuel, yes they will push the shuttle of 2 tons of weight.

I speak of weight not mass.



I do not have a scientific answer.....Does it work or not?

Image


Back to top
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 
 

Who is online 

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests


cron
© 2017 The International Space Fellowship, developed by Gabitasoft Interactive. All Rights Reserved.  Privacy Policy | Terms of Use