Headlines > News > Astronomy Question of the Week: How do we know that planets exist outside our Solar System?

Astronomy Question of the Week: How do we know that planets exist outside our Solar System?

Published by Matt on Mon Oct 12, 2009 10:32 am via: source
More share options

Even in ancient times, people observed the planets that orbit our Sun. Nowadays we know that there are many trillions of other stars in the Universe, in addition to the Sun. It seems likely that planets orbit many of these stars too.

The evidence that extrasolar planets (exoplanets for short) exist was obtained for the first time in the 1990s. However, exoplanets are small, non-luminous bodies that are light years away and as a rule indiscernible to us – how are we able to prove that they exist?

Exoplanet CoRoT-7b is five times heavier than the Earth. Credit:DLR

Exoplanet CoRoT-7b is five times heavier than the Earth. Credit:DLR

Since 1995, over 370 exoplanets have been found – and there appears to be no end to the discoveries. Although astronomers have now succeeded in making a direct optical verification, two indirect astronomical measuring techniques have been shown to be particularly reliable in the search for exoplanets: the ‘radial velocity’ method and the ‘transit’ method.

Methods to verify the existence of extrasolar planets

The radial velocity method is based on the premise that a star and the planet orbiting it have a reciprocal influence on each other due to their gravity. For this reason, the star moves periodically (in synchrony with movement of the planet around it) a little towards the observer and a little away from the observer along the line of sight. Due to the Doppler effect, in the electromagnetic spectrum of the star a radial movement such as this leads to a small periodic shift in the spectral lines – first towards the blue wavelength range, then back towards the red. (See also the astronomy question from week 38: How quickly is the Universe expanding?) If we analyse this movement of the spectral lines quantitatively, what is known as the radial-velocity curve can be derived from it. This yields parameters for the planetary orbit and the maximum mass of the planetary candidates. If the latter is less than the mass that a heavenly body requires to initiate thermonuclear fusion, the body is regarded as a planet.

The transit method works if the orbit of the planet is such that, when viewed from the Earth, it passes in front of the star. During the planet’s passage across the star disk, known as a transit, the planet’s presence reduces the amount of radiation from the stellar disc that reaches the observer and a decrease in the apparent brightness of the star can be measured. The radius of the planet and its density can be calculated from these measurements together with other data (such as the distance of the star from Earth) – astronomers then know whether the planet in question is a rocky planet or a gas planet. Such findings are incorporated into models of how planets are formed and help us to better understand how planetary systems develop.

It seems both of these methods require us to be aligned to some degree with the other planets. Assuming even more planets exist out there that are not aligned to our plane of orbit, have astronomers estimated all the ones we are missing?
Leave a reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
© 2015 The International Space Fellowship, developed by Gabitasoft Interactive. All Rights Reserved.  Privacy Policy | Terms of Use