| Page 3 of 3 |
[ 34 posts ] |
General interest of the people
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
Space Station Member  
Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2004 7:09 pm
Posts: 485 Location: Maastricht, The Netherlands 
|
 Posted on: Fri Sep 24, 2004 3:26 pmWouldnt it be just more difficult to land a suborbital plane between mountains? Unless it can land vertically off course
 |
| Back to top |
 |
|
Moderator  
Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2004 11:23 am
Posts: 3745 Location: Hamburg, Germany
|
Posted on: Sun Sep 26, 2004 9:17 am In my last answer I spoke of SS1 but concerning landing betwwen mountains I Thought of those XPRIZE-vehicles only that are launching an landing vertically. SS1 from my point of view isn't a solution for airports/spaceports placed between high mountaines.
Sorry for the misunderstanding. Dipl.-Volkswirt (bdvb) Augustin (Political Economist) |
| Back to top |
|
|
Spaceflight Trainee 
Joined: Wed Oct 06, 2004 1:22 pm
Posts: 34
|
Posted on: Sun Nov 21, 2004 6:15 pm I think the early space age and the fast developement 1959-1980, nowadays developement seem to have stalled compared to these days, only China are having space fever.
_________________ Have cool, will travel... |
| Back to top |
|
|
Space Station Member
Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2004 7:09 pm
Posts: 485 Location: Maastricht, The Netherlands
|
Posted on: Sun Nov 21, 2004 6:24 pm We barely need more developement to get into space. technology is there, we just need to get people who want to get into space and make a busseniss out of it, so it pays itself off.
There aren't simply enough people with the will ánd the money. |
| Back to top |
|
  |
Page 3 of 3 |
[ 34 posts ] |
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests |
Gabitasoft Interactive. All Rights Reserved.