Page 1 of 2 |
[ 29 posts ] |
NASA JSC Warp Drive News & Updates
Author | Message |
---|---|
Moon Mission Member ![]() ![]()
Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2004 11:52 am
Posts: 1401 Location: Exeter, Devon, England ![]() |
Just wondered if we had covered this or anyone had any new links.
Quote: Few people know this but NASA actually has a warp drive program underway at Johnson Space Center. A recent article on the program created some open-ended questions that needed to be answered. The article seemed to imply that Harold White (who heads the project) had signed non-disclosure agreements such that he could not discuss public-funded research. That's a little unusual for NASA. So I sent a series of questions to Harold White and NASA PAO. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xRMcEoQ8gWc http://spaceref.com/nasa-hack-space/pro ... ogram.html |
Back to top |
![]() ![]() |
Moon Mission Member ![]() ![]()
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2006 11:15 pm
Posts: 1050 Location: Columbus, GA USA ![]() |
NASA periodically funds "out there" research. This really isn't anything new or spectacular. A lot of it is politics and thinking of ways of spending stimulus funds that were earmarked for basic research.
We really don't even know what we don't know about interstellar travel. Yet. Even if we had a viable FTL propulsion system dropped into our laps, there are a legion of other problems that would have to be solved before we headed for the stars. So its neat and interesting, but don't hold your breath for a break through. |
Back to top |
![]() |
Space Walker ![]() ![]()
Joined: Tue May 15, 2012 4:32 am
Posts: 219 Location: Melbourne, Australia ![]() |
Rob Goldsmith wrote: Just wondered if we had covered this or anyone had any new links. Quote: Few people know this but NASA actually has a warp drive program underway at Johnson Space Center. A recent article on the program created some open-ended questions that needed to be answered. The article seemed to imply that Harold White (who heads the project) had signed non-disclosure agreements such that he could not discuss public-funded research. That's a little unusual for NASA. So I sent a series of questions to Harold White and NASA PAO. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xRMcEoQ8gWc http://spaceref.com/nasa-hack-space/pro ... ogram.html I have read through that link they provided to a pdf where he describes the experimental setup. How exactly is he planning to create the "warp" effect. It says it is a torroidal capacitor, so would it be an electric field caused by the ringlike distribution of a high enough charge? _________________ "SCREW THE RULES, WE HAVE MONEY!" http://www.freespaceships.com |
Back to top |
![]() ![]() |
Space Station Member ![]() ![]()
Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 6:16 pm
Posts: 341 ![]() |
Supposedly we can't produce a warp drive because it requires sending negative energy faster than light. But what if we keep the warp drive sublight? Even a sublight warp drive lets us travel at very close to the speed of light, without having to kill ourselves with the acceleration to get there quickly or worry about hitting a speck of dust... even if we can't go FTL, it lets us reach Mars in less than an hour and get to Saturn within a day, and whilst we wouldn't have time dilation shortening the (onboard) ~5 years it would take to reach Alpha Centauri, we could at least get there in that amount of time...
Though I must wonder what happens when you drop lower into a potential well whilst surrounded by your warp bubble. All that potential energy has to go somewhere, and if it doesn't go into speeding up your craft, might it go into heating up your craft...? I get the idea behind the quantum plasma thruster, I think. We know black holes can create mass from the quantum vacuum (by using it's own mass-energy), so might a sufficiently powerful electric field be able to do the same (say, by drawing the positrons that are randomly created to one side and giving them energy, allowing their entangled electron counterparts to come into existence - basically creating antimatter and matter from the vacuum)? Once you've got those, treat it as a normal antimatter rocket. Of course, you need to get that energy from somewhere, so it probably wouldn't make much sense, unless you can create a beam of neutrinos to get thrust from, since you don't have to worry about them hitting anything... Or you could thrust of WIMPs, if they exist and you can actually find a way to interact with them... |
Back to top |
![]() |
Space Station Commander ![]() ![]()
Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2010 2:21 pm
Posts: 547 Location: B.O.A. UK ![]() |
Terraformer wrote: I get the idea behind the quantum plasma thruster, I think. We know black holes can create mass from the quantum vacuum (by using it's own mass-energy), so might a sufficiently powerful electric field be able to do the same (say, by drawing the positrons that are randomly created to one side and giving them energy, allowing their entangled electron counterparts to come into existence - basically creating antimatter and matter from the vacuum)? Once you've got those, treat it as a normal antimatter rocket. Of course, you need to get that energy from somewhere, so it probably wouldn't make much sense, unless you can create a beam of neutrinos to get thrust from, since you don't have to worry about them hitting anything... IIRC In a a hard Vacuum due to quantum fluctuations (tho its possible everywhere and its just harder to spot them amongst normal matter) what are called virtual particles as they normally appear and disappear(annihilate each other) very quickly in pairs. Stephen Hawking suggested that near a black hole sometimes the black hole annihilates one of the virtual particles with negative energy and allows the other virtual particle to become real and take mass away from the black hole but this is so only for small mass black holes as according to wiki(having just checked some of the above) any black hole with a mass more than our moon would absorb more than it would lose from the CMB radiation because of course E=MC2. So black holes are not creating mass or energy they are just redistributing it that is of course if Hawking is right which is yet to be proven but could be if CERN gets to high enough energies. The thing that worries me about black holes is that as we have observed them existing they either prove the Big Bang did not happen and we are in some kind of steady state continuous creation Universe that just looks a bit like a Big Bang happened or what we think of now as fundamental constants are not and have changed over time as if all the matter/energy(E=MC2 remember) that now exists in the Universe were in a small area like that of the Big Bang it would be a very massive black hole with a very slow evaporation due to Hawking radiation not a fast inflating Universe. _________________ Someone has to tilt at windmills. So that we know what to do when the real giants come!!!! |
Back to top |
![]() ![]() |
Moon Mission Member ![]() ![]()
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2006 11:15 pm
Posts: 1050 Location: Columbus, GA USA ![]() |
Terraformer wrote: Supposedly we can't produce a warp drive because it requires sending negative energy faster than light. But what if we keep the warp drive sublight? Even a sublight warp drive lets us travel at very close to the speed of light, without having to kill ourselves with the acceleration to get there quickly or worry about hitting a speck of dust... Though I must wonder what happens when you drop lower into a potential well whilst surrounded by your warp bubble. All that potential energy has to go somewhere, and if it doesn't go into speeding up your craft, might it go into heating up your craft...? I'm afraid you don't have a clear idea of the concept of a "warp drive". The ship never goes FTL. In fact it barely moves at all in a relativistic sense. What the drive does is distorts space around it, compressing space in front of it and expanding it behind. The "warp" of the warp drive. As a way of visualizing it, pass a magnifying lens over a surface that represents space-time. The distorted image is what the warp drive does/has to do. How this actually works (or if it works at all) is all conjecture. Is there a traveling distortion that pulls the ship along (ala Star Trek), or does it "worm hole" thru space that has one long distortion field all the way from origin to destination point? Quote: I get the idea behind the quantum plasma thruster, Or you could thrust of WIMPs, if they exist and you can actually find a way to interact with them... Quantum physics is even less likely a FTL propulsion solution than "warp drive", unless you want to arrive at your destination one particle at a time... |
Back to top |
![]() |
Space Station Member ![]() ![]()
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2008 9:51 am
Posts: 455 Location: Vienna, Austria, Europe, Earth ![]() |
Rob Goldsmith wrote: Just wondered if we had covered this or anyone had any new links. I did post a link about the subject back in September viewtopic.php?f=7&t=11723&p=48167#p48167 But I'm not aware of any new informations about the project. ![]() _________________ pride comes before a fall |
Back to top |
![]() |
Moon Mission Member ![]() ![]()
Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2004 11:52 am
Posts: 1401 Location: Exeter, Devon, England ![]() |
Sorry bud, must have missed that bit
![]() |
Back to top |
![]() ![]() |
Space Station Member ![]() ![]()
Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 6:16 pm
Posts: 341 ![]() |
JamesG wrote: Terraformer wrote: Supposedly we can't produce a warp drive because it requires sending negative energy faster than light. But what if we keep the warp drive sublight? Even a sublight warp drive lets us travel at very close to the speed of light, without having to kill ourselves with the acceleration to get there quickly or worry about hitting a speck of dust... Though I must wonder what happens when you drop lower into a potential well whilst surrounded by your warp bubble. All that potential energy has to go somewhere, and if it doesn't go into speeding up your craft, might it go into heating up your craft...? I'm afraid you don't have a clear idea of the concept of a "warp drive". The ship never goes FTL. In fact it barely moves at all in a relativistic sense. What the drive does is distorts space around it, compressing space in front of it and expanding it behind. The "warp" of the warp drive. As a way of visualizing it, pass a magnifying lens over a surface that represents space-time. The distorted image is what the warp drive does/has to do. How this actually works (or if it works at all) is all conjecture. Is there a traveling distortion that pulls the ship along (ala Star Trek), or does it "worm hole" thru space that has one long distortion field all the way from origin to destination point? http://www.popsci.com/technology/article/2013-03/warp-factor?single-page-view=true Quote: Another challenge is that in order to create a warp bubble that moves faster than light, scientists would need to distribute negative energy around a craft, including ahead of it. White doesn’t think this is a problem; when I ask him about it, he says rather vaguely that a warp drive would work because of an “apparatus you have that’s creating the conditions that you need.” But creating those conditions in front of a ship would mean generating a distribution of negative energy that travels faster than light, a violation of the theory of general relativity. |
Back to top |
![]() |
Moon Mission Member ![]() ![]()
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2006 11:15 pm
Posts: 1050 Location: Columbus, GA USA ![]() |
There is your problem right there, basing your opinion on Popular Science.
![]() Electromagnetism is not gravity and vice versa. |
Back to top |
![]() |
Space Station Commander ![]() ![]()
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 7:44 am
Posts: 707 Location: Haarlem, The Netherlands ![]() |
Well, but there are some people in Norway who would probably be happy to give some money to whomever manages to unify them
![]() I've tried to read the PDF, but don't know enough (anything, actually ![]() _________________ Say, can you feel the thunder in the air? Just like the moment ’fore it hits – then it’s everywhere What is this spell we’re under, do you care? The might to rise above it is now within your sphere Machinae Supremacy – Sid Icarus |
Back to top |
![]() |
Space Station Member ![]() ![]()
Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 6:16 pm
Posts: 341 ![]() |
The graviton is unlikely to be able to travel faster than light... if it could, then we could presumably find a way to generate gravitational waves that go FTL, and thus build ourselves an ansible.
|
Back to top |
![]() |
Space Station Member ![]() ![]()
Joined: Mon Dec 12, 2011 6:40 am
Posts: 476 Location: California and Michigan ![]() |
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_tu ... than_light
I have no idea what ever is going on anywhere, ever...... says physics... _________________ Let not the bindings of society hold you back from improving it.... the masses follow where the bold explore. |
Back to top |
![]() |
Moon Mission Member ![]() ![]()
Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2004 11:52 am
Posts: 1401 Location: Exeter, Devon, England ![]() |
I am just happy that this isnt all guess work and hope.
This was what caught my eye: Quote: White says he’s found a way around that limitation. In a computer simulation, White varied the strength and geometry of a warp field. He determined that, in theory, he could produce a warp bubble using millions of times less negative energy than Alcubierre predicted and perhaps little enough that a space craft could carry the means of producing it. “The findings,” he says, “change it from impractical to plausible.” http://www.popsci.com/technology/articl ... tor?page=1 At least computer simluations are showing the right things. Also this was an interesting quote: Quote: The device looks like a large red velvet doughnut with wires tightly wound around a core, and it's one of two initiatives Eagleworks is pursuing, along with warp drive. It's also secret. When I ask about it, White tells me he can't disclose anything other than that the technology is further along than warp drive ... Yet when I ask how it would create the negative energy necessary to warp space-time he becomes evasive. What is it! didnt the Nazis spin wires around things to make them hover or such like? Rob |
Back to top |
![]() ![]() |
Spaceflight Enthusiast ![]() ![]()
Joined: Sat Jul 27, 2013 4:33 am
Posts: 1 ![]() |
In Star Trek a warp field is generated by a sub-space bubble. In the field of quantum mecanics it is possible that forward velocity would generate the warp field.
|
Back to top |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
Page 1 of 2 |
[ 29 posts ] |
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 56 guests |