| Page 3 of 3 |
[ 41 posts ] |
SFS News: SpaceX - Falcon 9 Progress Update
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
Space Walker ![]()
Joined: Sun May 16, 2010 6:36 pm
Posts: 113 |
Marcus Zottl wrote: Anyway, an increase from 125K to 140K is still quite impressive! Yeah... I've read an article about the guy behind Merlin (and I think Draco and Kestrel as well) design. Forgot the name unfortunately, but he impressed me a lot. |
| Back to top |
|
|
Space Station Member ![]()
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2008 9:51 am
Posts: 420 Location: Vienna, Austria, Europe, Earth |
Mchl wrote: Yeah... I've read an article about the guy behind Merlin (and I think Draco and Kestrel as well) design. Forgot the name unfortunately, but he impressed me a lot. Tom Mueller? _________________ pride comes before a fall |
| Back to top |
|
|
Space Walker ![]()
Joined: Sun May 16, 2010 6:36 pm
Posts: 113 |
Marcus Zottl wrote: Tom Mueller? The same! Thanks |
| Back to top |
|
|
Space Walker ![]()
Joined: Wed Jul 28, 2004 8:30 am
Posts: 236 Location: Perth, Western Australia |
JamesHughes wrote: That's was interesting - 117k lbs to LEO is quite a big chunk of mass. Launch end of next year - so a while to wait! Although Elon Musk really does need to practice his public speaking a bit more!!! According to the SpaceX website: “Falcon Heavy will arrive at our Vandenberg, California, launch complex by the end of next year, with liftoff to follow soon thereafter. First launch from our Cape Canaveral launch complex is planned for late 2013 or 2014.” Press got it wrong as usual, _________________ Beancounter from Downunder |
| Back to top |
|
|
Space Station Commander ![]()
Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2004 8:47 am
Posts: 517 Location: Science Park, Cambridge, UK |
Not sure what you are saying. The Vandenburg launch is late 2012 maybe early 2013, the Cape launch a year later. So first launch end of next year (or earlier the following) as I (sort of) wrote.
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Space Walker ![]()
Joined: Sun May 16, 2010 6:36 pm
Posts: 113 |
Some of the press reported first FH launch as late 2013 though.
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Space Station Commander ![]()
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 7:44 am
Posts: 625 Location: Haarlem, The Netherlands |
Well, maybe they didn't believe Elon
Anyway, that is quite an impressive ramp-up. Could it be that they were running the 1A way below the original design specs, and that much of this upgrading is really just expanding the envelope, as they gain more test data and confidence in their design and manufacturing processes? _________________ Say, can you feel the thunder in the air? Just like the moment ’fore it hits – then it’s everywhere What is this spell we’re under, do you care? The might to rise above it is now within your sphere Machinae Supremacy – Sid Icarus |
| Back to top |
|
|
Space Walker ![]()
Joined: Sun May 16, 2010 6:36 pm
Posts: 113 |
Lourens wrote: Could it be that they were running the 1A way below the original design specs, and that much of this upgrading is really just expanding the envelope, as they gain more test data and confidence in their design and manufacturing processes? Could be. Or they just learn that they can actually safely go above original specs. Just like SSME that routinely run at 109% of original specs Wikipedia wrote: Specifying power levels over 100% may seem nonsensical, but there is a logic behind it. The 100% level does not mean the maximum physical power level attainable. Rather it is a specification, decided on early during SSME development, for the expected rated power level. Later studies indicated the engine could operate safely at levels above 100%, which is now the norm. |
| Back to top |
|
|
Space Walker ![]()
Joined: Sun May 16, 2010 6:36 pm
Posts: 113 |
Mchl wrote: Lourens wrote: Could it be that they were running the 1A way below the original design specs, and that much of this upgrading is really just expanding the envelope, as they gain more test data and confidence in their design and manufacturing processes? Could be. Or they just learn that they can actually safely go above original specs. Just like SSME that routinely run at 104.5% of original specs Wikipedia wrote: Specifying power levels over 100% may seem nonsensical, but there is a logic behind it. The 100% level does not mean the maximum physical power level attainable. Rather it is a specification, decided on early during SSME development, for the expected rated power level. Later studies indicated the engine could operate safely at levels above 100%, which is now the norm. |
| Back to top |
|
|
Space Walker ![]()
Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2007 12:45 pm
Posts: 143 |
Lourens wrote: Well, maybe they didn't believe Elon from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Merlin_1C#Merlin_1C Quote: As configured for use on Falcon 1 vehicles, the Merlin 1C had a sea level thrust of 350 kN (78,000 lbf), a vacuum thrust of 400 kN (90,000 lbf) and a vacuum specific impulse of 304 seconds. In this configuration the engine consumed 140 kg (300 lb) of propellant per second. Tests have been conducted with a single Merlin 1C engine successfully running a total of 27 minutes (counting together the duration of the various tests), which equals ten complete Falcon 1 flights.[15] As configured for use on the newer Falcon 1e and Falcon 9 vehicles, the Merlin 1C has a sea level thrust of 560 kN (125,000 lbf), and an isp of 300.[16] I assume they first made the 1C work with the necessary thrust to get Falcon 1 off the ground (78-ish klbf), then gradually improved it. So at some point it was probably 95 klbf, then with further tweaking they finally arrived at 125 klbf. |
| Back to top |
|
|
Space Station Commander ![]()
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 7:44 am
Posts: 625 Location: Haarlem, The Netherlands |
But according to the same Wikipedia article they actually did upgrade parts of the engine between versions, so it wasn't just pushing the envelope. Still, the 1A version probably had quite a bit of margin left, otherwise they wouldn't have been able to get it up to almost twice its original performance.
_________________ Say, can you feel the thunder in the air? Just like the moment ’fore it hits – then it’s everywhere What is this spell we’re under, do you care? The might to rise above it is now within your sphere Machinae Supremacy – Sid Icarus |
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Page 3 of 3 |
[ 41 posts ] |
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests |



Gabitasoft Interactive. All Rights Reserved.