| Page 1 of 1 |
[ 4 posts ] |
Anyone here from the Canadian Arrow project?
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
Spaceflight Participant ![]()
Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2004 6:40 pm
Posts: 67 Location: Toronto, Ontrio, Canada |
If you are from that team, or if you are simply a fan of that X-Prize
project, then you may be encouraged by this piece of news.... FIRST: While I don't see the Canadian Arrow project launching an astronaut into space this summer, and thus not in the competition against Scaled Composites, or the Da Vinci Project [the other Canadian competition] for the 10 million dollar X-Prize. SECOND: But I do believe that the Canadian Arrow team, if they were to receive multimillion dollar sponsership from some Canadian billionaires [i.e., The Bronfmanns, Mr. Irving, etc...] may have a shot of being the first to launch a civilian spaceshot into LEO within 10-15 years using the Canadian Arrow technology [really V2 technology updated] as a starting point. THIRD: The Canadian Arrow rocket motor uses LOX-Alcohol for propellant [specific impulse(sl) = 200-205 seconds] and achieves 56,000 Ibs of thrust, burn-time about 65 seconds; all basically similar to the V2 rocket. BUT!...If the Canadian Arrow team were to receive multimillion dollar Canadian private sponsership, they may be able to fund a stretched version of their rocket with a cluster of FIVE rocket motors at liftoff [56,000Ibs of thrust x 5 = 280,000Ibs], with stretched propellant tanks containing not 9 metric-tons of liquid propellant, but 75 metric-tons for the FIRST-STAGE. THEN!....By changing the liquid-propellant from LOX-Alcohol [Isp = 200 seconds] to LOX-Ammonia [Isp = 250 seconds] they would boost the FIRST STAGE combined thrust from 280,000 Ibs to around 350,000Ibs, similar to the thrust generated by John Glenn's ATLAS rocket booster. |
| Back to top |
|
|
Space Station Commander ![]()
Joined: Mon Oct 06, 2003 9:22 pm
Posts: 858 Location: New York, NY |
interesting idea.... i'd imagine they'd also need a bigger vehicle to do that.
_________________ Cornell 2010- Applied and Engineering Physics Software Developer Also, check out my fractals |
| Back to top |
|
|
Moderator ![]()
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2004 4:01 am
Posts: 750 Location: New Zealand |
I was looking into a similar thread of development.
Can Arrows version of the motor only produces 15,000 poinds of thrust and is pressurised, instaed of turbine powered, hence the second stage. (A V2 could hit 150km all on its own.) Also the V2 was tweaked only marginally by the Russians into the R2 to produce 75,000-80,000 pounds of thrust. To go bigger, Can-arrow needs: - Full strength engine - Gutsy Turbines - Gimbaled thrust control. But othewise yeah, you build an 6 Xprize vehicles and strap the all together... _________________ What goes up better doggone well stay up! - Morgan Gravitronics, Company Slogan. |
| Back to top |
|
|
Space Station Member ![]() ![]()
Joined: Mon Apr 12, 2004 4:16 am
Posts: 322 |
If you interlaced the fuel systems you'd have engine-out redundancy, another handy thing that Von Braun favored later on with the Saturns.
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Page 1 of 1 |
[ 4 posts ] |
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests |





Gabitasoft Interactive. All Rights Reserved.