| Page 1 of 2 |
[ 27 posts ] |
Will SpaceX's fourth attempt reach Orbit?
Will SpaceX's fourth attempt reach Orbit?
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
Moon Mission Member ![]()
Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2004 11:52 am
Posts: 1263 Location: Exeter, Devon, England |
Thought id see your thoughts now!
Doesnt take long to vote guys, so lets see if you believe the next attempt will make it! Lets see ya thoughts! _________________ > http://www.fullmoonclothing.com > http://www.facebook.com/robsastrophotography > robgoldsmith@hotmail.co.uk Last edited by Rob Goldsmith on Sat Jun 27, 2009 9:09 am, edited 1 time in total. |
| Back to top |
|
|
Moon Mission Member ![]()
Joined: Mon Nov 01, 2004 6:15 pm
Posts: 1233 Location: London, England |
I think that they will reach orbit, but then again I have thought that on the last 2 attempts which goes to show what I know.
I am actually less hopeful now and think that there is likely be problems. _________________ A journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step. |
| Back to top |
|
|
Spaceflight Trainee ![]()
Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2005 1:25 am
Posts: 35 |
I'm in the same boat as Andy as being less hopeful.
_________________ Gary A Lantz
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Space Walker ![]()
Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2007 12:45 pm
Posts: 143 |
I think with each failed launch their chance of success on the next launch increases. I'm optimistic so I voted success, but I won't be surprised if I'm wrong.
I think launching a space rocket is like writing a computer program. Some errors will be apparent during design, some will reveal themselves during compilation/manufacture, some will be revealed by simulations and testing, and some will be so subtle that they only appear during actual use. Once the program/rocket has been used a few times without problems, the chance of new problems revealing themselves becomes drastically smaller, and this is where a simple, robust design is important. The fewer possible sources of errors, the less likely something goes wrong. |
| Back to top |
|
|
Moon Mission Member ![]()
Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2004 11:52 am
Posts: 1263 Location: Exeter, Devon, England |
65 views now and the Fellowship crew seem to be very unsure YET still voting that it will get into space!
Come on the rest of ya! _________________ > http://www.fullmoonclothing.com > http://www.facebook.com/robsastrophotography > robgoldsmith@hotmail.co.uk |
| Back to top |
|
|
Space Walker ![]()
Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2004 1:04 pm
Posts: 249 Location: Norway |
My bet is that it won't be a 100% success, but I don't think (OK - hope!) that it won't be a complete failure. I'd have pushed the 95% success option if it was there :)
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Space Station Member ![]()
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2008 9:51 am
Posts: 420 Location: Vienna, Austria, Europe, Earth |
I've voted for the 100% success option.
Since the last failure on flight3 was caused by some overlooked differences between the Merlin 1A and 1C Engines, I highly doubt that SpaceX will allow something similar to happen again on flight4. If I remember correctly, then there won't be any new components on flight4, so I'm pretty confident, that they will make it this time! To sum it up: - No new components (no large unknowns) - first stage has performed as expected on the last 2 flights. - I think they have learned their lessons on the second stage from flight2 as well - "Murphy" should be more than satisfied by now! There have been enough "small failures" on the way so far to calm him down. |
| Back to top |
|
|
Spaceflight Trainee ![]()
Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2005 1:25 am
Posts: 35 |
Rob Goldsmith wrote: 65 views now and the Fellowship crew seem to be very unsure YET still voting that it will get into space! I'd bet there's a voting line between hoping they'll make it and believing... _________________ Gary A Lantz
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Moderator ![]()
Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2004 11:23 am
Posts: 3745 Location: Hamburg, Germany |
I didn't vote yet. I think there is a very good chance that they will succeed since the cause of the recent failure was that small that there was nearly no chance to detect it by ground tests and measurements - the only chance to find it was the launch and flight.
In so far and because of an internal voice I tend to vote for success. On the other hand I am not sure enough and become aware of the circumstance that I can't imagine if and what other problems undetectable on the ground might impact future launches and flights or be detected doing those flights. In so far they are really a large step further to orbit. But the second stage did have no chance to prove reliability at the recent flight and Elon Musk himself also said that the failure prevented them from finding out if they have got rid of problems detected at the second flight. But there is one interesting and relevant aspect - both in the recent and the second flight the second stage got no chance because it was hit or crashed by the first stage. So successfully avoiding physical contact between the two stages may mean they succeed in the next flight. Dipl.-Volkswirt (bdvb) Augustin (Political Economist) |
| Back to top |
|
|
Moon Mission Member ![]() ![]()
Joined: Tue Oct 05, 2004 5:38 pm
Posts: 1361 Location: Austin, Texas |
Well I am just too impressed with SpaceX to vote anything but orbit. They just handle every setback with such grace and professionalism and determination that it blows me away! How they handle failure more than how they handle success is the true test of the character of a person or a company. Let these first 3 launches forever silence those who say space flight isn’t really so hard, requiring only money and the will to do it.
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Space Walker ![]()
Joined: Wed Jul 28, 2004 8:30 am
Posts: 236 Location: Perth, Western Australia |
Had to vote for success even though the little voice inside says that spaceflight is 'hard' and failure is 'easy'.
Each failure has resulted in lessons learned and even SS1 and WK1 had to fly many times in test before the real thing. _________________ Beancounter from Downunder |
| Back to top |
|
|
Space Station Member ![]()
Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2004 7:09 pm
Posts: 485 Location: Maastricht, The Netherlands |
Well, will it be today or won't it be?
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Moon Mission Member ![]()
Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2003 8:46 pm
Posts: 1204 Location: Kapellen, Antwerp, Belgium, Europe, Planet Earth, the Milky Way Galaxy |
Hi Stefan,
In our time zone (Brussels Time), it is scheduled to be between 1pm-9pm Wednesday morning. _________________ Heavier-than-air flying machines are impossible. - Lord Kelvin, 1892 |
| Back to top |
|
|
Moon Mission Member ![]()
Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2004 11:52 am
Posts: 1263 Location: Exeter, Devon, England |
post the info as you get it guys!
_________________ > http://www.fullmoonclothing.com > http://www.facebook.com/robsastrophotography > robgoldsmith@hotmail.co.uk |
| Back to top |
|
|
Moon Mission Member ![]()
Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2003 8:46 pm
Posts: 1204 Location: Kapellen, Antwerp, Belgium, Europe, Planet Earth, the Milky Way Galaxy |
It's delayed: Updated launch window estimate is now Sept 28th through Oct 1st
_________________ Heavier-than-air flying machines are impossible. - Lord Kelvin, 1892 |
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Page 1 of 2 |
[ 27 posts ] |
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest |







Gabitasoft Interactive. All Rights Reserved.