| Page 4 of 4 |
[ 49 posts ] |
Bigelow technology
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
Moon Mission Member ![]()
Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2004 2:56 am
Posts: 1104 Location: Georgia Tech, Atlanta, GA |
I didn't know there were any plans for a third Falcon yet....
I *knew* there was a reason I was excited about interviewing with SpaceX this Tuesday.... <goes checks coat and tie yet again to make sure they're clean> _________________ American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Daniel Guggenheim School of Aerospace Engineering In Memoriam... Apollo I - Soyuz I - Soyuz XI - STS-51L - STS-107 |
| Back to top |
|
|
Moderator ![]()
Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2004 11:23 am
Posts: 3745 Location: Hamburg, Germany |
"MOVED" here from the Possible Craft-thread because it is another anser to posts of this thread but has no relation to the Possible Craft-thread. Dipl.-Volkswirt (bdvb) Augustin (Political Economist).
The article "SpaceX Sets Launch Debut for Falcon 1 Rocket" ( www.space.com/missionlaunches/051118_fa ... pacex.html ) says that Quote: A second Falcon 9 flight is slated for 2008 for Las Vegas, California’s Bigelow Aerospace, which is developing inflatable orbital modules to support a private space station, SpaceX officials said So SpaceX/Elon Musk have kept Bigelow Aerospace as customer but switched him to a later date and a larger vehciel only. May be that Bigelow was one of the people who asked them to develop larger vehciles. Dipl.-Volkswirt (bdvb) Augustin (Political Economist) |
| Back to top |
|
|
Moon Mission Member ![]()
Joined: Mon Nov 01, 2004 6:15 pm
Posts: 1233 Location: London, England |
Ekkehard Augustin wrote: So SpaceX/Elon Musk have kept Bigelow Aerospace as customer but switched him to a later date and a larger vehciel only. May be that Bigelow was one of the people who asked them to develop larger vehciles. The thing to remember here is that it will not be the same payload being launched, SpaceX has lost the earlier launch and could lose the other as well. I think that keeping Bigelow as a customer will depend on how long it takes SpaceX to get Falcon IX up and running. If there are similar delays to those that occurred during Falcon I development and his own inflatable development is on time or ahead of time he will probably launch on another booster even though it might cost more money. He has already switched his smallest inflable to a Dnepr, there is no reason he wont switch the others to other boosters. Not sure what commitment has been made by Bigelow but it wont be too firm as Falcon IX was only announced recently and does not exist yet. _________________ A journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step. |
| Back to top |
|
|
Moderator ![]()
Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2004 11:23 am
Posts: 3745 Location: Hamburg, Germany |
As far as I understand and remember it Falcon 9 will use the same engines as Falcon 1. The reusability technology will be the same except the upper stage which isn't reusable at the Falcon 1 but is intended to be at the Falcon 9.
So a lot developments already have been done and it development will be concentrated on scaling-up and improvements - like Scaled's and The Starship Company's work on SS2. The maiden flight of the Falcon 1 will show, how much will have to be done after that launch. If all works well then the engines are developed already - what will have to be tested is to use them "bundled". There are three years until late 2008 - given the development time up to now that's not to short to get problems solved and development done. Given the customer Elon Musk will be extremely interested to avoid further delays. Dipl.-Volkswirt (bdvb) Augustin (Political Economist) |
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Page 4 of 4 |
[ 49 posts ] |
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests |


Gabitasoft Interactive. All Rights Reserved.