| Page 2 of 2 |
[ 18 posts ] |
People are unaware of the potential of private space flight
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
Moon Mission Member ![]() ![]()
Joined: Tue Oct 05, 2004 5:38 pm
Posts: 1361 Location: Austin, Texas |
It takes 3.8 km/s to go from LEO to Mars trajectory. If the engine has an exhaust velocity of 3.8 km/s, then all but 1/e of the mass has to be propellant, which works out to 36% payload and 64% propellant. So of the 3,600 kg, about 2,300 kg is propellant and 1,300 kg payload. Of course a higher exhaust velocity would improve that greatly, but 3.8 km/s is pretty good performance for any engine using storable propellants and not so bad even for LOX/RP1.
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Space Station Member ![]()
Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2004 7:09 pm
Posts: 485 Location: Maastricht, The Netherlands |
Thanks! Interesting figures. It's not that hopeless as i had thought.
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Space Station Member ![]()
Joined: Thu Jan 27, 2005 12:34 am
Posts: 450 |
Depending on your fuel, you can get to the Moon using about 75% of your mass in LEO for fuel to accelerate to near escape velocity AND brake into lunar orbit. Somewhat LESS is needed to accelerate into a Mars transfer orbit (8 month transfer time). Aerobraking at Mars requires very little fuel. (It does require a camera, derived from prototypes we have in operation, which will allow you to precisely monitor and adjust your intercept trajectory.)
With 3600 kg to LEO with a Dnepr ($12 Million), you get up to 1200 kg into Mars orbit. (If, that is, you want to orbit. An interesting 3 year “free return†|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Page 2 of 2 |
[ 18 posts ] |
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests |



Gabitasoft Interactive. All Rights Reserved.