LAUGH looking at the undersideLAS-like NASA "MLAS"

.

EIGHT months ago, I've proposed MY idea of an "underside-LAS":





in my April 5, 2007 article:

http://www.gaetanomarano.it/articles/020newLAS.html

then, last december, NASA has proposed the "MLAS" as a possible tower-LAS alternative:





exposed in this article:

http://www.nasaspaceflight.com/content/?cid=5300

AGAIN... OF COURSE... they say that have "invented" it in 2006...

"invented it before", "devloped internally", "already thought", etc. ...it's going to be a classic with my ideas...

however, but there is NOT any PUBLIC evidence of that... NO 2006 news, NO 2006 articles or .pdf on the NASA site, NOTHING

what's really curious and funny, is that LOTS of "experts" have written critics and insults against me in the past months saying "how much" my ideas was unfeasible, not a good engineering choice, bad, heavy, etc. etc. etc.

while NOW that a similar idea (but not good like MY idea) is proposed by NASA, everybody take it seriously, or are silent...

.

Canadian Arrow or someone had this setup about 6 years ago

Its perfectly valid, it just makes heatshields awkward and you can't jettison it easily (increasing LEO payload).

Also I would give up on ever getting credit for anything. Especially from NASA. Just move on to the next task, advocacy is thankless. If you don't like it then use your intelligence to write sci-fi scripts and boooks.

Damn funny this

I propose gaetanomarano for the next NASA administrator, is there nothing this man hasn't thought of?

With him in charge we'll have men on the Martian surface yesterday.