| Page 1 of 2 |
[ 17 posts ] |
What Sci-fi spacecraft are most plausible?
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
Space Walker ![]()
Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2006 6:28 am
Posts: 189 Location: Northern California |
I'm sure most of us here at Space Fellowship are avid science fiction fans. SO I wanted to everyone what sci-fi spacecraft do you think is most plausible and realistic in being build in some form or another. On some recent shows great effort was taken to portray how spacecraft would actually maneuver in space (Babylon-5 being one such example). According to wikipedia:
Quote: NASA approached producer J. Michael Straczynski, interested in adapting the design of the Starfury as a model for a forklift to be used in the construction of the International Space Station. Straczynski agreed, asking only that the name of the resulting craft remain "Starfury." Interesting... _________________ Something is impossible until it isn't! |
| Back to top |
|
|
Space Walker ![]()
Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2004 1:04 pm
Posts: 249 Location: Norway |
Puddle Jumper from Stargate Atlantis maybe?
I'm still dreaming of the day there's a major break through in propulsion tech... :) Maybe in the end we'll be able to create Lighthuggers, as created by the Conjoiners (Consciousness Joiners) in the books by Alastair Reynolds, which I have to highly recommend. Also check the Conjoiner Engines a few paragraphs above the Lighthugger :-) |
| Back to top |
|
|
Moon Mission Member ![]()
Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2004 11:52 am
Posts: 1276 Location: Exeter, Devon, England |
what about the rocket in first contact, a private industry group do it together away from Goverments
sounds familiar no? _________________ > http://www.fullmoonclothing.com > http://www.facebook.com/robsastrophotography > robgoldsmith@hotmail.co.uk |
| Back to top |
|
|
Space Walker ![]()
Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2004 1:04 pm
Posts: 249 Location: Norway |
Rob Goldsmith wrote: what about the rocket in first contact, a private industry group do it together away from Goverments :) sounds familiar no? :P I thought he was talking about what the future would bring and not present day scenarios? ;) |
| Back to top |
|
|
Space Station Commander ![]() ![]()
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 12:55 pm
Posts: 506 Location: Germany |
I love Babylon 5 !!!
(something that has to be said _________________ "The hardest hurdle to space isn't the technicalities and money. But rather, the courage and the will to do it." - Burt Rutan. |
| Back to top |
|
|
Space Station Member ![]()
Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2004 7:09 pm
Posts: 485 Location: Maastricht, The Netherlands |
With B5 you don't have to imagine anything. With the rest, imagination is required
Unless, archeologists would find a mysterius ring in the egyptian desert. |
| Back to top |
|
|
Space Walker ![]()
Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2006 6:28 am
Posts: 189 Location: Northern California |
Klaus Schmidt wrote: I love Babylon 5 !!! (something that has to be said An amazing show. I can't decide which show is better, Babylon 5 or the new Battlestar Galactica. _________________ Something is impossible until it isn't! |
| Back to top |
|
|
Space Walker ![]()
Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2004 1:04 pm
Posts: 249 Location: Norway |
Rocket Scientist wrote: An amazing show. I can't decide which show is better, Babylon 5 or the new Battlestar Galactica. Without a doubt BSG, then B5, SGx, Farscape and Andromeda Never really understood the Star Trek fascination. |
| Back to top |
|
|
Space Walker ![]()
Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2006 6:28 am
Posts: 189 Location: Northern California |
IrquiM wrote: Without a doubt BSG, then B5, SGx, Farscape and Andromeda Never really understood the Star Trek fascination. Star Trek is the "granddaddy" of them all. Star Trek is the reason we have all these modern sci-fi shows exist. _________________ Something is impossible until it isn't! |
| Back to top |
|
|
Space Walker ![]()
Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2004 1:04 pm
Posts: 249 Location: Norway |
I can understand the first few seasons, but The Next Generation? Enterprise? etc... It's just boring with the same plots all over again with different ears and colour on the clothes
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Space Walker ![]()
Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2006 6:28 am
Posts: 189 Location: Northern California |
IrquiM wrote: I can understand the first few seasons, but The Next Generation? Enterprise? etc... It's just boring with the same plots all over again with different ears and colour on the clothes You must have seen some other Next Generation show. _________________ Something is impossible until it isn't! |
| Back to top |
|
|
Space Walker ![]()
Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2006 6:28 am
Posts: 189 Location: Northern California |
Anyway back to spacecraft, I was always impressed by Babylon 5 Starfury spacectaft and how it pivots around the CG to maneuver quickly.
The follwing link has a detailed description and some neat color drawings. http://efni.org/Aurora.htm _________________ Something is impossible until it isn't! |
| Back to top |
|
|
Spaceflight Participant ![]()
Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2007 1:04 am
Posts: 56 Location: Brisbane, Australia |
FireFly from Serenity is cool as well as fairly realistic, it's basically a rip off of Osprey - an experimental chopper-plane project. Also there are a number of thrust vector shuttles in various sci-fi movies and books. Spaceships from Space Odissey are Ultra realistic, the only complaint being that they don't have radiator wings that they should. Star Wars Y-wing shuttle will fly with some modifications. Flying Saucers of all types are Ultra realistic by definition since that's what the aliens fly
_________________ I've become Death, the Destroyer of worlds... |
| Back to top |
|
|
Space Station Member ![]()
Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 6:16 pm
Posts: 314 |
How much energy are you talking?
With sufficient energy, any of those craft are possible. If we could collect enough energy (it would almost certainly have to be Z-Point) we could build warp drives. |
| Back to top |
|
|
Spaceflight Participant ![]()
Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2007 1:04 am
Posts: 56 Location: Brisbane, Australia |
Just good old fashioned plasma thrusters powered by nukes or equally energetic processess. Just on the side note, there is no reason to belive that hypothetical Z-generators would be powerful. Inexaustable energy yes, but powerful? I seriously doubt it. I seem to recall that New Scientist run a article about Dark Energy and it's implications for Z P energy. Apparrently our best and brightest ran a few after the fact calculations, fudged some numbers, waves their hands focus pokus like and declared that Z P energy is 10^100 times smaller than they thought previously. So ech, this kills that idea...
_________________ I've become Death, the Destroyer of worlds... |
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Page 1 of 2 |
[ 17 posts ] |
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests |






Gabitasoft Interactive. All Rights Reserved.