| Page 1 of 1 |
[ 4 posts ] |
Interesting hydrogen gas anomaly?
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
Spaceflight Participant ![]()
Joined: Fri Oct 21, 2005 12:42 pm
Posts: 73 Location: Washington DC |
I recently came across the website of Hydrogen Technology Applications, Inc. after seeing a news clip. It looked interesting enough to do some more research.
They claim to have invented a way of electrolyzing water into a hydrogen and oxygen mixture (they call it HHO) with very strange properties, namely: * varying energy content * doesn't obey standard PVT gas laws * bonds to other fuels and enhances their BTU content If true, this could be BIG. (Applications in enhancing rocket fuels?) on the other hand, it could be ... well, I don't know. check it out for yourself! here's their website: HHO Gas Here's a couple of patent applications that try to explain the anomalous properties: describing the gas describing the electrolyte an atomic explanation of the property? That last one is kind of strange. Mr. Santilli has published this stuff and requested feedback/verification from the scientific community: here What do you think? |
| Back to top |
|
|
Spaceflight Enthusiast ![]()
Joined: Mon Jun 05, 2006 9:03 pm
Posts: 2 Location: Germany |
Regarding water energy anomalies keywords like "Schauberger, Condensed Matter Nuclear Sciences, anomalous excess heat in plasma electrolysis, sonoluminescence..." start popping up in my mind.
Some links: http://jlnlabs.imars.com/bingofuel/html/aquagen.htm http://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/Takaha ... alouse.pdf I think there is a lot to discover out there. In connection with plasma electrolysis experiments nuclear transmutations are frequently reported. That correlates with the claims that the heat of the aquafuel flame depends on the contact material. |
| Back to top |
|
|
Spaceflight Participant ![]()
Joined: Fri Oct 21, 2005 12:42 pm
Posts: 73 Location: Washington DC |
yeah...
There's always two sides to the argument. one side of my brain says, well, why can't it be true? We for sure don't know everything about how the world works! and the other side says, well then if this is so simple, how come everyone isn't doing it? why the perpetual dependence on fossil fuels? The other hand replies with conspiracy theories and I start nervously looking around the room.. and then go do something else and try not to think about it. The one thing that set off warning bells, though, was the place in Mr. Santilli's scientific paper that talked about the measured properties of something at absolute zero. I used to have a 1988 Chevy Spectrum (a little 4-cylinder hatchback of a car) that got like, 35 miles per gallon. After hearing about it from a friend, I hooked up an atomizer (spray nozzle) from an oil furnace so that it sprayed directly into the carburator, and sprayed a fine mist of water into the carburator (of course letting the engine get warmed up first so as not to wash down the cylinder walls). When I did this, my fuel efficiency went up to 45-53 miles a gallon. I'm not sure why or how, but it did. Which makes me inclined to believe that their claims are at least BASED on fact, even if I'm skeptical about 'magnecules' and the rest. |
| Back to top |
|
|
Space Station Commander ![]()
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 1:25 am
Posts: 887 |
The B-52s used water injection in their jets for awhile, IIRC.
HHO?--I have my doubts. |
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Page 1 of 1 |
[ 4 posts ] |
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests |



Gabitasoft Interactive. All Rights Reserved.