Community > Forum > Technology & Science > New Propulsion Technology.

New Propulsion Technology.

Posted by: Rolf Guthmann - Sun Dec 04, 2005 8:19 pm
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.
 [ 6 posts ] 
New Propulsion Technology. 
Author Message
Rocket Constructor
Rocket Constructor
avatar
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2005 7:37 pm
Posts: 6
Post New Propulsion Technology.   Posted on: Sun Dec 04, 2005 8:19 pm
Dear friends:

There is more than 20 years that I research the operation of the gravity.

With the acquired knowledge, I developed a theory that explains your operation.

It is the QTG, or Quantum Theory of Gravity.

Until the present moment, any physical or any other specialist in the area, got to drop my theory.

The origin of gravity reside in the asymmetry of the electromagnetic phenomena.

It is an relativistic problem, that depends on the reference adopted.

My inertia generator is considered by some, mainly for those that understood the theory, the best patent, of an alternative system of propulsion of the world.

With some basic knowledge in physics, and following the reasoning patiently, you can understand the operation of my inertia generators.

http://rolfguthmann.sites.uol.com.br/En ... heory.html

For all these years I accomplished several experiences, in which it submitted magnets and/or Electro-magnets in high rotations, to the most several interactions.

In 1996 I became aware of the experience of Tampere in Finland, accomplished by Russian Ing. Podkletnov.

The objective of this experience was testing superconductors ceramic’s under the effect of intense magnetic fields.

Where a mysterious gravitational anomaly was observed above a superconductor disk in rotation.

See the site: Podkletnov's basic article (2001): http://www.arxiv.org/abs/physics/0108005

This effect was never very understood, nor either there was some reasonable explanation for him.

In the report of the experience (Conclusion), it is mentioned a vibration, an oscillation or a bad swinging of the disk, that didn't leave the disk naturally in the horizontal.

This vibration got my attention a lot, because here that I found a relationship with my experience of the past.

It was here that I got to join the jigsaw puzzles among my invention,

This experience was replicated other times, by NASA, BOING, many other, etc.., never the anomaly was observed entirely, it seems that some thing conspires against, as larger the investment, worst are the results.

Without understanding how the gravity works it is very difficult to get positive results.

My New patent has the best explanation of the Podkletnov's gravity anomaly.

Rolf Guthmann

The complete text is in the following Site:

http://rolfguthmann.sites.uol.com.br/English/index.html
[/b]

_________________
Quantum Theory of Gravity - “QTG”
The Powerful new law of the gravity !!
http://rolfguthmann.sites.uol.com.br/English/index.html


Back to top
Profile WWW
Spaceflight Trainee
Spaceflight Trainee
avatar
Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2005 7:15 pm
Posts: 40
Location: Houston
Post    Posted on: Sun Dec 04, 2005 9:23 pm
Rolf, this post looks more like an advertisement than anything else, and I wonder if that is appropriate here?

_________________
Enthusiast


Back to top
Profile
Moon Mission Member
Moon Mission Member
User avatar
Joined: Tue Oct 05, 2004 5:38 pm
Posts: 1361
Location: Austin, Texas
Post Re: New Propulsion Technology.   Posted on: Sun Dec 04, 2005 9:59 pm
Rolf Guthmann wrote:
Without understanding how the gravity works it is very difficult to get positive results.
Have you gotten positive results yourself? In other words, have you built a machine that repeatably gives the expected result?


Back to top
Profile WWW
Moon Mission Member
Moon Mission Member
avatar
Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2004 2:56 am
Posts: 1104
Location: Georgia Tech, Atlanta, GA
Post    Posted on: Sun Dec 04, 2005 10:11 pm
As do I, Enthusiast. Unless Rolf can convince us reasonably soon that this is not an advertisement (and therefore spam), this thread will have to be locked.

_________________
American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics
Daniel Guggenheim School of Aerospace Engineering

In Memoriam...
Apollo I - Soyuz I - Soyuz XI - STS-51L - STS-107


Back to top
Profile
Rocket Constructor
Rocket Constructor
avatar
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2005 7:37 pm
Posts: 6
Post    Posted on: Sun Dec 04, 2005 11:52 pm
Enthusiast wrote:

Quote:
Rolf, this post looks more like an advertisement than anything else, and I wonder if that is appropriate here?


Please look at this topic: http://www.spacefellowship.com/Forum/about1568.html


What do you think, I am selling? Technology? Then?!



I am a theoretical physicist, besides being electronic engineer.

The intention here, is to reveal and to discuss an alternative Technology of propulsion.

Much viable and modern than the impulse with rockets used from to 2nd WW.

We know that this propulsion type is highly dangerous, and it owes, soon, to be substituted.

This is my proposal.

I don't only know if in this forum, the participants possess technical and theoretical knowledge to understand my ideas.

Rolf Guthmann

_________________
Quantum Theory of Gravity - “QTG”
The Powerful new law of the gravity !!
http://rolfguthmann.sites.uol.com.br/English/index.html


Back to top
Profile WWW
Moon Mission Member
Moon Mission Member
User avatar
Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2003 8:46 pm
Posts: 1215
Location: Kapellen, Antwerp, Belgium, Europe, Planet Earth, the Milky Way Galaxy
Post    Posted on: Mon Dec 05, 2005 12:29 am
Topic locked.

Since it's the same theory as in:
http://www.spacefellowship.com/Forum/vi ... php?t=1565

That topic will handle all related questions, including propulsions.

Rolf Guthmann, for what I know, yes, you're currently selling your theories. As example your introduction with "Dear friends"... I know a lot of psychology.. and that's not how you're "creating friends", but tricking people in supporting you.. but creating ennemies more quickly as well.
As a person knowing a lot of theories, you should know, you still have to make friends at The Space Fellowship (this website). So know that this is a community that works with facts, information, reliable information, background info, etc... Since I only see a theory, and I guess that means "it's unproven", I don't think we can talk about a propulsion, before you can actually prove your theory is right with more basic tests.

Quote:
I don't only know if in this forum, the participants possess technical and theoretical knowledge to understand my ideas


I studied Industrial Electricity at school, it included a lot.. of electronics, and I clearly understand what you're talking about.
I've studied gravity myself, and for those who're interested I made a very "flawed" but interesting concept of gravity myself years ago, just to think about it (didn't revelaed anything new, but it was nice research work for myself). Today, I can only look back with joy and entertainment to it, cause now I know a lot more, knowing my idea or attempt to think about it back than was having many flaws...
http://www.spacefellowship.com/Forum/vi ... php?p=9287 (enjoy ;))
I was 17 or 18 on that moment, so it was a nice try.


But I know, you shouldn't invest your time into "propulsion" technology based on your theory, when you can't even create a simple test proving your theory, that's what you should be working on. If not, prove me wrong, and use your other topic, to do so.
Cause I can't understand how you can be talking about a propulsion, when you can't show us or anyone else your theory is more than what it is, a "theory".
All the theory's I've seen about propulsion are based on smaller proven laws of physics etc, cause creating the propulsion itself is already damn difficult.

Quote:
Until the present moment, any physical or any other specialist in the area, got to drop my theory.

The origin of gravity reside in the asymmetry of the electromagnetic phenomena.

It is an relativistic problem, that depends on the reference adopted.

My inertia generator is considered by some, mainly for those that understood the theory, the best patent, of an alternative system of propulsion of the world.


I would like to add, that if you can't prove it's wrong, it does NOT mean you are right. That's why you need to "test" your theory.

Feel free to continue in your other topic, but this technology forum is not for dreamers, cause until proven otherwise, that's what your propulsion theory "is". Cause you "guess" your theory is right, without a real life experiment, showing you're actually right.
Or should we start a whole new forum about flying cars, flying houses, flying cities.., all based on your "theory" ?.
Please respect yourself, and don't run too fast, I don't say your theory is wrong, but in my opinion, it's wrong to run too fast with "assumptions", especially in this forum.

_________________
Heavier-than-air flying machines are impossible. - Lord Kelvin, 1892


Back to top
Profile WWW
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 6 posts ] 
 

Who is online 

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests


© 2014 The International Space Fellowship, developed by Gabitasoft Interactive. All Rights Reserved.  Privacy Policy | Terms of Use