New Propulsion Technology.

Dear friends:

There is more than 20 years that I research the operation of the gravity.

With the acquired knowledge, I developed a theory that explains your operation.

It is the QTG, or Quantum Theory of Gravity.

Until the present moment, any physical or any other specialist in the area, got to drop my theory.

The origin of gravity reside in the asymmetry of the electromagnetic phenomena.

It is an relativistic problem, that depends on the reference adopted.

My inertia generator is considered by some, mainly for those that understood the theory, the best patent, of an alternative system of propulsion of the world.

With some basic knowledge in physics, and following the reasoning patiently, you can understand the operation of my inertia generators.

http://rolfguthmann.sites.uol.com.br/En ... heory.html

For all these years I accomplished several experiences, in which it submitted magnets and/or Electro-magnets in high rotations, to the most several interactions.

In 1996 I became aware of the experience of Tampere in Finland, accomplished by Russian Ing. Podkletnov.

The objective of this experience was testing superconductors ceramic’s under the effect of intense magnetic fields.

Where a mysterious gravitational anomaly was observed above a superconductor disk in rotation.

See the site: Podkletnov's basic article (2001): http://www.arxiv.org/abs/physics/0108005

This effect was never very understood, nor either there was some reasonable explanation for him.

In the report of the experience (Conclusion), it is mentioned a vibration, an oscillation or a bad swinging of the disk, that didn't leave the disk naturally in the horizontal.

This vibration got my attention a lot, because here that I found a relationship with my experience of the past.

It was here that I got to join the jigsaw puzzles among my invention,

This experience was replicated other times, by NASA, BOING, many other, etc.., never the anomaly was observed entirely, it seems that some thing conspires against, as larger the investment, worst are the results.

Without understanding how the gravity works it is very difficult to get positive results.

My New patent has the best explanation of the Podkletnov's gravity anomaly.

Rolf Guthmann

The complete text is in the following Site:

http://rolfguthmann.sites.uol.com.br/English/index.html
[/b]

Rolf, this post looks more like an advertisement than anything else, and I wonder if that is appropriate here?

Have you gotten positive results yourself? In other words, have you built a machine that repeatably gives the expected result?

As do I, Enthusiast. Unless Rolf can convince us reasonably soon that this is not an advertisement (and therefore spam), this thread will have to be locked.

Enthusiast wrote:



Please look at this topic: http://www.spacefellowship.com/Forum/about1568.html


What do you think, I am selling? Technology? Then?!



I am a theoretical physicist, besides being electronic engineer.

The intention here, is to reveal and to discuss an alternative Technology of propulsion.

Much viable and modern than the impulse with rockets used from to 2nd WW.

We know that this propulsion type is highly dangerous, and it owes, soon, to be substituted.

This is my proposal.

I don't only know if in this forum, the participants possess technical and theoretical knowledge to understand my ideas.

Rolf Guthmann

Topic locked.

Since it's the same theory as in:
http://www.spacefellowship.com/Forum/vi ... php?t=1565

That topic will handle all related questions, including propulsions.

Rolf Guthmann, for what I know, yes, you're currently selling your theories. As example your introduction with "Dear friends"... I know a lot of psychology.. and that's not how you're "creating friends", but tricking people in supporting you.. but creating ennemies more quickly as well.
As a person knowing a lot of theories, you should know, you still have to make friends at The Space Fellowship (this website). So know that this is a community that works with facts, information, reliable information, background info, etc... Since I only see a theory, and I guess that means "it's unproven", I don't think we can talk about a propulsion, before you can actually prove your theory is right with more basic tests.



I studied Industrial Electricity at school, it included a lot.. of electronics, and I clearly understand what you're talking about.
I've studied gravity myself, and for those who're interested I made a very "flawed" but interesting concept of gravity myself years ago, just to think about it (didn't revelaed anything new, but it was nice research work for myself). Today, I can only look back with joy and entertainment to it, cause now I know a lot more, knowing my idea or attempt to think about it back than was having many flaws...
http://www.spacefellowship.com/Forum/vi ... php?p=9287 (enjoy )
I was 17 or 18 on that moment, so it was a nice try.


But I know, you shouldn't invest your time into "propulsion" technology based on your theory, when you can't even create a simple test proving your theory, that's what you should be working on. If not, prove me wrong, and use your other topic, to do so.
Cause I can't understand how you can be talking about a propulsion, when you can't show us or anyone else your theory is more than what it is, a "theory".
All the theory's I've seen about propulsion are based on smaller proven laws of physics etc, cause creating the propulsion itself is already damn difficult.



I would like to add, that if you can't prove it's wrong, it does NOT mean you are right. That's why you need to "test" your theory.

Feel free to continue in your other topic, but this technology forum is not for dreamers, cause until proven otherwise, that's what your propulsion theory "is". Cause you "guess" your theory is right, without a real life experiment, showing you're actually right.
Or should we start a whole new forum about flying cars, flying houses, flying cities.., all based on your "theory" ?.
Please respect yourself, and don't run too fast, I don't say your theory is wrong, but in my opinion, it's wrong to run too fast with "assumptions", especially in this forum.